Table of Contents

The Great Lakes, holding the distinction as the world's largest unfrozen surface freshwater system, face unprecedented challenges as global temperatures continue to rise. The Laurentian Great Lakes hold paramount significance in maintaining the ecological integrity and socioeconomic prosperity of the Great Lakes Basin, supporting millions of residents and driving economic activity worth trillions of dollars. Climate change is fundamentally altering the delicate water balance of these massive inland seas, creating cascading effects that ripple through natural ecosystems, regional economies, and the daily lives of communities across eight U.S. states and two Canadian provinces.

Understanding the Great Lakes Water System

The five Great Lakes—Superior, Michigan, Huron, Erie, and Ontario—form an interconnected freshwater system that contains approximately 21 percent of the world's surface freshwater supply. The dynamic water levels of the Great Lakes play a pivotal role in numerous infrastructure sectors by influencing multiple factors such as shipping costs, flood risks, water intake locations and coastal erosion. These water levels are not static; they fluctuate naturally based on seasonal patterns, precipitation, evaporation, and runoff from surrounding watersheds.

Over the past decades, the water levels of the Great Lakes have undergone dramatic fluctuations, exhibiting a range exceeding 2 meters. This natural variability has always been part of the Great Lakes ecosystem, but climate change is now introducing new patterns and extremes that challenge our ability to predict and manage these vital water resources.

The Science Behind Water Level Changes

Net Basin Supply Components

The water levels of the Great Lakes are primarily governed by the net basin supplies (NBS) of each lake which are the sum of over-lake precipitation and basin runoff minus lake evaporation. Understanding how climate change affects each of these three components is essential to projecting future water levels and preparing for their impacts.

These changes are due to climate-induced alterations in the three primary components of the lakes' water budget: over-lake precipitation, lake evaporation, and basin runoff. Each component responds differently to warming temperatures, creating a complex interplay that determines whether water levels will rise or fall in any given period.

Evaporation and Temperature Increases

Rising air and water temperatures have profound effects on evaporation rates across the Great Lakes. As air and water temperatures have risen, summertime evaporation rates have more than doubled since the 1980s. This dramatic increase in evaporation represents one of the most significant climate-driven changes affecting the water balance of the lakes.

Warmer water temperatures also lead to reduced ice cover on the lakes, allowing for evaporation from exposed surface water throughout a longer part of the year. During winter months, ice cover traditionally acts as a barrier that prevents evaporation. As winters become milder and ice cover diminishes, the lakes lose more water to the atmosphere year-round, fundamentally altering their seasonal water level patterns.

Precipitation Patterns and Runoff

Precipitation over the lakes adds to the water supply of the basin and increases water levels, while evaporation does the opposite. Climate models project that the Great Lakes region will experience changes in both the amount and timing of precipitation, with more intense rainfall events becoming increasingly common.

Runoff adds to water levels, and is directly affected by factors such as snow cover and soil moisture. As temperatures warm, more winter precipitation falls as rain rather than snow, leading to immediate runoff instead of gradual spring snowmelt. This shift affects not only the total amount of water entering the lakes but also the timing of peak water levels throughout the year.

Historical Variability

Great Lakes' water levels cycle several feet between periods of high water and low water over decades. During long-term periods of dry weather, lake levels fall. This natural cyclical pattern has characterized the Great Lakes for centuries, but recent decades have seen increasingly dramatic swings between extremes.

Long-term water levels in the Great Lakes fell during the period from 1998-2013, after record highs were reached in the 1980s, and changes in precipitation and evaporation partially contributed to those declines. In the early 2010's, prolonged dry and warm weather resulted in record lows for some lakes. These record lows raised concerns about long-term declining trends and prompted extensive research into climate change impacts.

The 2019-2020 Record Highs

The narrative shifted dramatically in the mid-2010s. A rapid decline in lake evaporation due to colder winters triggered a record-setting water level rise in 2013–2014 which was followed by persistent above-average precipitation, resulting in record high levels during 2019-2020. This happened in 2015 to 2020, one of the wettest 5-year periods on record for the Great Lakes region and resulted in the 2020 record high water event.

These rapid transitions from record lows to record highs within just a few years demonstrate the increasing volatility of Great Lakes water levels under changing climate conditions. Communities that had adapted to low water conditions suddenly faced flooding, erosion, and infrastructure damage from high water—a pattern that may become more common in the future.

Recent Conditions

Current water level conditions continue to show significant variability across the lakes. During the month of July, the Great Lakes Basin experienced the following: The mean monthly water level of Lake Superior was at its average level, while Lake Michigan-Huron was above average. Lake Erie remained well above average, while Lake Ontario was very close to average. This variability among the individual lakes reflects the complex regional climate patterns and differing lake characteristics that influence water levels.

Future Water Level Projections

Advanced Modeling Approaches

Scientists have made significant advances in projecting future Great Lakes water levels by developing more sophisticated climate models. GLARM is a three-dimensional (3D) regional climate modeling system for the Great Lakes region that two-way couples an RCM to a 3D hydrodynamic lake and ice model, making this the first study to use such an advanced model for water level projection of the Great Lakes.

Recent studies have found that many of these earlier models were overestimating evapotranspiration from the Great Lakes. Newer, more comprehensive models that better account for evapotranspiration project smaller declines or even rises in water levels into the future. This represents a significant shift from earlier projections that generally predicted declining water levels.

Projected Increases in Water Levels

The most recent and sophisticated modeling studies suggest that water levels are more likely to rise than fall in the coming decades. According to the ensemble average, by 2040–2049, the average annual water levels of Lake Superior, Michigan-Huron, and Erie are projected to increase by +0.19, +0.44, and +0.28 m, respectively, relative to 2010–2019.

The projected NBS increase is mostly due to an increase in over-lake precipitation and basin runoff combined with a relatively smaller increase in lake evaporation. While evaporation will increase with warmer temperatures, the models suggest that increases in precipitation and runoff will more than compensate for this water loss.

Uncertainty and Range of Outcomes

Despite improved modeling capabilities, significant uncertainty remains in water level projections. The projected changes in the average annual water levels by 2040–2049 relative to 2010–2019 range from −0.01 to +0.32 m in Lake Superior, −0.13 to +0.80 m in Lake Michigan-Huron and −0.09 to +0.54 m in Lake Erie. This wide range reflects the inherent uncertainty in climate projections and the complex interactions between atmospheric and lake processes.

The results show that the range of possible values grows as the climate changes, with more extreme values for the lake levels becoming possible with greater changes in the global mean temperature. This increase in the range on both the high and low end may be a more important consideration than any general increase in the average water level for those living around the lakes Because the most severe impacts on the interests around the lake are usually associated with these extreme high or low levels.

Regardless of projected long-term trends, seasonal, annual, and multi-year variability in lake levels is expected to remain large. This ongoing variability means that communities and industries must prepare for both high and low water extremes, even if average levels trend in one direction.

Economic Significance of the Great Lakes Region

A Global Economic Powerhouse

The Great Lakes region represents one of the most economically productive areas in North America. The area is home to 107 million people, 51 million jobs, and a GDP of US$6 trillion – making the Great Lakes Economy a powerhouse on an international level. If it were its own country, it would have a GDP of US$6 trillion – making it the third biggest economy in the world.

The $4.1T GRP of the Great Lakes region represented a substantial portion (25%) of the binational economy of the US and Canada in 2011. This massive economic engine depends heavily on the Great Lakes themselves, with water levels playing a critical role in multiple sectors including shipping, manufacturing, tourism, energy production, and agriculture.

Maritime Shipping and Transportation

The Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway System serves as a vital transportation corridor connecting the heart of North America to global markets. Cargo shipments on the Great Lakes-Seaway waterway generate 50 billion USD of economic activity and 356,858 jobs in Canada and the U.S. This waterborne commerce supported 241,286 U.S. and Canadian jobs and generated $36 billion/C$46.8 billion in economic activity, US$17.8 billion/C$23.2 billion in total personal wage and salary income and local consumption expenditures, US$8.3 billion/C$10.8 billion in local purchases, and US$6.3 billion/C$8.3 billion in federal, state/provincial, and local tax revenue.

It alone accounts for more than 50% of all U.S./Canadian bilateral border trade and sees over 200 million tons of cargo shipped annually. The efficiency and cost-effectiveness of this shipping system depend critically on maintaining adequate water depths in channels, harbors, and connecting waterways—all of which are directly affected by water level fluctuations.

Manufacturing and Industry

In particular, the region is well-known globally for its manufacturing prowess. It's home to automobile and aerospace giants like Ford, GM, Chrysler, Bombardier, GE Aviation, and Magna International, and also many other diverse industries. These manufacturing operations rely on the Great Lakes for water supply, cooling systems, and transportation of raw materials and finished products.

As was the case historically, the region's natural endowments, especially the Great Lakes themselves, continue to be important economic engines. However, certain sectors such as agriculture, heavy industry, and trans-oceanic shipping have negatively impacted the health of the Great Lakes while other sectors such as tourism and sport fishing impact the lakes very little but are directly reliant on Great Lakes ecological integrity.

Tourism and Recreation

The Great Lakes support a thriving tourism and recreation industry that generates billions of dollars annually. Beaches, marinas, fishing charters, boating, and waterfront attractions draw millions of visitors each year. Water levels directly affect the quality and accessibility of these recreational opportunities, with both high and low extremes creating challenges for tourism operators and coastal communities.

The Great Lakes support more than 1.3 million jobs that generate $82 billion in wages annually, according to an analysis of 2018 economic data. This employment spans diverse sectors, all of which have some connection to the health and stability of the Great Lakes water system.

Impacts of Water Level Changes on Shipping and Navigation

Low Water Challenges

When water levels drop, shipping operations face significant constraints and increased costs. Lower water levels reduce the depth of navigation channels, forcing cargo vessels to carry lighter loads to avoid running aground. This "light loading" means that more trips are required to transport the same amount of cargo, increasing fuel costs, labor expenses, and transit times.

Harbors and ports may become inaccessible to larger vessels during low water periods, disrupting supply chains and forcing cargo to be rerouted through alternative, often more expensive, transportation modes such as rail or truck. Dredging operations to maintain channel depths become more frequent and costly, straining the budgets of port authorities and government agencies responsible for navigation infrastructure.

The economic impacts of low water levels extend beyond direct shipping costs. Industries that depend on just-in-time delivery of raw materials may face production delays and increased inventory costs. Agricultural producers shipping grain to export markets may receive lower prices if transportation costs increase. Power plants that rely on water intake systems may need to make costly modifications to access water at lower levels.

High Water Challenges

While high water levels might seem beneficial for navigation, they create their own set of problems. Vessels must maintain adequate clearance beneath bridges and through locks, and extremely high water can reduce this clearance to unsafe levels. Ships may need to reduce their loads even during high water periods to maintain safe clearance, negating some of the depth advantages.

High water levels increase the risk of damage to port infrastructure, including docks, warehouses, and loading equipment. Strong currents associated with high water can make navigation more hazardous and slow vessel transit times. The increased water velocity through connecting channels can also accelerate erosion of shorelines and underwater structures.

Infrastructure Investment and Adaptation

The latest investment survey, compiled by maritime trade consultants Martin Associates, totals $10.9 billion CDN in capital spending on ships, ports, terminals, and waterway infrastructure within the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence region. From 2018 to 2022, over $7.4 billion has been invested in the navigation system, and another $3.5 billion has been committed for improvements from 2023 to 2027.

These massive infrastructure investments reflect the critical importance of maintaining reliable navigation on the Great Lakes, but they also highlight the challenges of designing systems that must function across an increasingly wide range of water level conditions. Engineers and planners must now account for greater extremes in both directions when designing new facilities or upgrading existing infrastructure.

Shoreline Erosion and Coastal Infrastructure

Erosion Processes and Impacts

Shoreline erosion represents one of the most visible and damaging impacts of changing water levels on Great Lakes communities. With water levels remaining above average on some lakes and the possibility of large storms and winds, low-lying areas are at risk for accelerated coastline erosion and flooding. The combination of high water levels and storm events creates particularly severe erosion conditions.

During high water periods, waves reach higher up the shoreline, attacking bluffs, dunes, and coastal structures that are normally above the water line. This erosion can undermine buildings, roads, and utilities located near the shore. Property owners may lose significant portions of their land, and in extreme cases, homes and businesses may become uninhabitable or collapse into the lake.

Low water levels create different erosion challenges. As water recedes, previously submerged areas become exposed to wave action and weathering. The transition zone between high and low water marks experiences repeated cycles of wetting and drying, which can accelerate erosion of certain soil types. Additionally, low water can expose and damage shoreline protection structures that were designed to function while partially submerged.

Infrastructure Vulnerability

Coastal infrastructure throughout the Great Lakes region faces increasing vulnerability to water level extremes. Water intake systems for municipal water supplies and industrial facilities must be designed to function across a wide range of water levels. During low water periods, intakes may become exposed or unable to draw water, requiring expensive emergency measures or permanent modifications.

Wastewater treatment plants located near shorelines face risks from both high and low water. High water can flood facilities or overwhelm outfall systems, while low water can affect the dilution and dispersal of treated effluent. Marinas, harbors, and recreational facilities require constant adaptation to changing water levels, with boat launches, docks, and breakwaters needing adjustment or replacement.

Roads, bridges, and other transportation infrastructure near the shoreline face damage from both erosion and flooding. The costs of protecting, relocating, or repeatedly repairing this infrastructure represent a significant and growing burden for local governments and property owners.

Adaptation and Protection Measures

Communities around the Great Lakes are implementing various strategies to protect shorelines and infrastructure from water level impacts. Traditional "hard" engineering approaches include seawalls, revetments, and breakwaters designed to absorb wave energy and prevent erosion. However, these structures are expensive to build and maintain, and they can sometimes transfer erosion problems to adjacent properties.

Nature-based solutions are gaining popularity as alternatives or complements to hard engineering. These approaches include restoring coastal wetlands, planting native vegetation to stabilize soils, and creating living shorelines that provide erosion protection while maintaining ecological functions. Such solutions can be more cost-effective and provide additional benefits such as wildlife habitat and water quality improvement.

The variability of Great Lakes water levels is necessary for the continued health of the Lakes but can create challenges for waterfront communities and homeowners. Giving the Lakes the space they need to change will protect our infrastructure and ensure healthy Great Lakes for future generations. This perspective emphasizes the importance of working with natural water level variability rather than trying to completely control it.

Impacts on Aquatic Ecosystems and Fisheries

Habitat Changes

Water level fluctuations play a crucial role in maintaining the ecological health of the Great Lakes. Natural variability creates diverse habitats along shorelines, including wetlands, marshes, and shallow water areas that support fish spawning, nursery areas for young fish, and feeding grounds for waterfowl and other wildlife. However, the increasing magnitude and rapidity of water level changes under climate change can disrupt these ecological processes.

Rapid increases in water level can flood terrestrial vegetation, creating new wetland habitat but also drowning established plant communities before they can adapt. Conversely, rapid declines can strand aquatic vegetation and leave fish spawning areas high and dry. The timing of water level changes relative to critical life cycle events for fish and wildlife can determine whether populations thrive or suffer.

Coastal wetlands, which provide essential ecosystem services including water filtration, flood control, and biodiversity support, are particularly sensitive to water level changes. These transitional zones between land and water require specific hydrological conditions to maintain their characteristic plant communities and ecological functions. Extreme or prolonged deviations from normal water levels can convert wetlands to open water or dry land, eliminating their unique ecological value.

Fisheries and Commercial Fishing

The Great Lakes support valuable commercial and recreational fisheries that contribute significantly to regional economies. Water level changes affect fish populations through multiple pathways, including alterations to spawning habitat, changes in water temperature and chemistry, and shifts in food web dynamics. Species that spawn in shallow nearshore areas are particularly vulnerable to water level fluctuations that can expose or flood their nests.

Commercial fishing operations face direct economic impacts from changing water levels. Access to fishing grounds and harbors can be restricted during low water periods, while high water can damage fishing infrastructure and make certain areas too dangerous to navigate. Changes in fish population abundance and distribution driven by water level impacts on habitat can affect catch rates and the economic viability of fishing operations.

Recreational fishing, which generates substantial economic activity through license sales, equipment purchases, and tourism spending, is similarly affected. Anglers may find favorite fishing spots inaccessible or unproductive due to water level changes. Marinas and charter fishing operations must adapt their facilities and services to accommodate varying water conditions, incurring costs that may be passed on to customers.

Water Quality Considerations

Water levels influence water quality in the Great Lakes through several mechanisms. During low water periods, pollutants become more concentrated, potentially exceeding water quality standards and affecting aquatic life. Reduced water volumes can also lead to warmer water temperatures, lower dissolved oxygen levels, and increased algal growth, all of which stress fish and other aquatic organisms.

High water levels can improve water quality in some respects by diluting pollutants and increasing water circulation. However, flooding can also mobilize contaminants from shoreline areas and overwhelm stormwater and wastewater systems, leading to pollution events. The interaction between water levels and water quality adds another layer of complexity to managing Great Lakes ecosystems under climate change.

Flooding Risks and Community Impacts

Residential and Commercial Property Damage

High water levels pose significant flooding risks to communities throughout the Great Lakes region. Thousands of homes, businesses, and public facilities are located in areas vulnerable to flooding during high water events. The 2019-2020 record high water levels caused hundreds of millions of dollars in property damage, with some communities experiencing repeated flooding events over multiple years.

Flooding damages buildings, destroys personal property, and can render homes uninhabitable for extended periods. Even when water does not enter buildings, high water can undermine foundations, flood basements and crawl spaces, and damage septic systems and wells. The costs of repairs, temporary housing, and lost business revenue create significant financial hardships for property owners and communities.

Insurance coverage for flood damage is often limited or unavailable in high-risk areas, leaving property owners to bear the full cost of losses. This can lead to declining property values in vulnerable areas and difficulty selling homes, trapping residents in risky situations. Some communities have implemented buyout programs to relocate residents from the most vulnerable areas, but these programs are expensive and can be controversial.

Public Health and Safety Concerns

Flooding creates various public health and safety hazards beyond direct property damage. Floodwaters can become contaminated with sewage, chemicals, and other pollutants, creating health risks for residents and cleanup workers. Mold growth in flooded buildings poses respiratory health risks that can persist long after floodwaters recede.

High water levels can cut off access to communities, isolating residents and making it difficult for emergency services to respond. Roads, bridges, and other critical infrastructure may be damaged or destroyed, requiring lengthy and expensive repairs. The stress and disruption caused by repeated flooding events take a toll on mental health and community cohesion.

Low water levels create different public health concerns. Exposed lake bottom sediments can harbor contaminants that become airborne as dust, potentially affecting air quality. Reduced water levels in harbors and marinas can concentrate pollutants and create stagnant conditions that promote harmful algal blooms and bacterial growth.

Emergency Management and Response

Managing water level extremes requires coordinated emergency response efforts across multiple jurisdictions and agencies. Local, state, provincial, and federal governments must work together to monitor conditions, issue warnings, provide assistance to affected communities, and coordinate recovery efforts. The increasing frequency and severity of water level extremes strain emergency management resources and budgets.

Communities are developing emergency action plans specifically for high and low water scenarios, identifying vulnerable areas, establishing evacuation routes, and pre-positioning resources for rapid response. Public education campaigns help residents understand risks and prepare for potential flooding or other water level impacts. However, maintaining public awareness and preparedness over time is challenging, especially during periods of normal water levels.

Agricultural Impacts and Water Supply

Irrigation and Water Availability

Agriculture in the Great Lakes region depends on reliable water supplies for irrigation, livestock watering, and food processing. While the region generally receives adequate precipitation, irrigation is important for high-value crops and during dry periods. Water level changes in the Great Lakes can affect the availability and cost of water for agricultural use.

During low water periods, farmers who draw water directly from the lakes or connecting rivers may face restrictions or need to invest in longer intake pipes or pumping systems. Groundwater levels in areas near the lakes are often connected to lake levels, so declining lake levels can reduce groundwater availability for wells. These water supply challenges can reduce crop yields and increase production costs.

High water levels can flood agricultural land near shorelines, destroying crops and making fields inaccessible for planting or harvesting. Saturated soils from prolonged high water can delay spring planting and reduce yields even after water recedes. Flooded fields may require years to recover full productivity, especially if erosion has removed topsoil or deposited sand and debris.

Food Processing and Agricultural Industries

The Great Lakes region hosts significant food processing industries that depend on water for cleaning, cooling, and processing operations. These facilities require reliable water supplies at consistent quality and temperature. Water level changes that affect intake systems or water quality can disrupt operations and increase costs.

Agricultural transportation also depends on stable water levels. Grain elevators and other agricultural facilities located on the lakes rely on ship transport to move products to market. Low water levels that restrict shipping capacity can create bottlenecks during harvest season, forcing farmers to store grain longer or use more expensive transportation alternatives. These disruptions can affect farm income and food prices for consumers.

Energy Production and Hydropower

Hydroelectric Generation

Hydroelectric facilities on the Great Lakes and connecting waterways generate significant amounts of renewable electricity. Water levels directly affect the amount of power these facilities can produce, with both high and low extremes creating challenges. Optimal power generation requires maintaining water levels within specific ranges that balance energy production with other water management objectives such as navigation, flood control, and environmental protection.

During low water periods, reduced flow through hydroelectric turbines decreases power generation, potentially requiring utilities to rely more heavily on fossil fuel plants to meet demand. This increases electricity costs and greenhouse gas emissions, creating a feedback loop that exacerbates climate change. High water levels can exceed the capacity of hydroelectric facilities to safely pass water, requiring spillage that represents lost generation opportunities.

The St. Lawrence River hydroelectric facilities, which are among the largest in the region, must carefully balance power generation with maintaining water levels in Lake Ontario and ensuring safe navigation through the seaway. Climate change impacts on water levels complicate this already challenging balancing act, potentially requiring modifications to operating rules and infrastructure.

Thermal Power Plant Operations

Nuclear and fossil fuel power plants located on the Great Lakes use lake water for cooling, withdrawing and returning enormous volumes of water daily. These facilities require reliable access to cooling water to operate safely and efficiently. Water level changes can affect intake and discharge systems, potentially forcing plants to reduce output or shut down during extreme conditions.

Low water levels may expose intake structures or reduce the temperature differential available for cooling, decreasing plant efficiency. High water levels can flood facilities or affect the dispersal of heated discharge water, potentially creating environmental concerns. The costs of adapting cooling systems to function across wider water level ranges can be substantial, and these costs are ultimately passed on to electricity consumers.

Climate change is also increasing water temperatures in the Great Lakes, which reduces the cooling efficiency of thermal power plants regardless of water level. The combination of changing water levels and temperatures creates compounding challenges for energy infrastructure that was designed for more stable conditions.

Adaptation Strategies and Water Management

Binational Coordination and Governance

Managing Great Lakes water levels requires coordination between the United States and Canada through the International Joint Commission (IJC) and various binational agreements. The IJC oversees the operation of control structures on the St. Marys River and St. Lawrence River that regulate outflows from Lakes Superior and Ontario. These structures provide limited ability to influence water levels, but their operation must balance multiple competing interests.

Recent years have seen increased attention to adaptive management approaches that can respond to changing conditions and incorporate new scientific understanding. The IJC has updated operating plans for Lake Ontario and the St. Lawrence River to better balance flood and erosion risks with other objectives. Similar efforts are underway for other parts of the system, but the complexity of stakeholder interests and the limitations of physical control structures constrain what can be achieved through operational changes alone.

Improved forecasting and monitoring systems help water managers and stakeholders prepare for changing conditions. There is one official seasonal water level forecast for the Great Lakes, issued jointly by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - Detroit District and Environment and Climate Change Canada's Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Regulation Office during the first week of each month. These agencies have operational authority through the International Joint Commission to oversee operation of the control structures on the St. Marys River (Lake Superior outlet; Corps-Detroit) and the St. Lawrence River (Lake Ontario outlet; Corps-Buffalo). Each agency utilizes a number of tools to produce their own 6-month forecast for Great Lakes lake-wide average water levels.

Infrastructure Resilience and Design Standards

Adapting infrastructure to function across wider ranges of water levels requires updating design standards and investing in more resilient systems. New construction in coastal areas should account for projected water level extremes, including appropriate setbacks from shorelines and elevation of critical facilities above flood levels. Existing infrastructure may need retrofitting or relocation to reduce vulnerability.

Flexible infrastructure designs that can accommodate varying water levels are increasingly important. Floating docks, adjustable water intakes, and modular shoreline protection systems provide adaptability that fixed structures cannot match. While these solutions may have higher initial costs, they can prove more cost-effective over the long term by avoiding repeated damage and repair cycles.

Building codes and zoning regulations in coastal areas are being updated to reflect increased risks from water level extremes. Some jurisdictions are restricting new development in high-risk areas or requiring enhanced protection measures. These regulatory approaches face political challenges but are essential for reducing future losses and avoiding unsustainable patterns of development.

Ecosystem-Based Management

Protecting and restoring natural ecosystems provides multiple benefits for adapting to water level changes. Coastal wetlands absorb wave energy, reduce erosion, and provide flood storage capacity while supporting biodiversity and water quality. Restoring wetlands and other natural shoreline features can be more cost-effective than hard engineering approaches and provides co-benefits that engineered structures cannot.

Watershed management practices that reduce runoff and promote groundwater recharge help moderate water level fluctuations and improve water quality. Green infrastructure in urban areas, including rain gardens, permeable pavements, and urban forests, reduces stormwater flows that contribute to flooding and erosion. Agricultural conservation practices such as cover cropping and buffer strips reduce soil erosion and nutrient runoff while improving water retention.

Protecting undeveloped shorelines and establishing conservation easements prevents development in high-risk areas and maintains natural processes that support ecosystem resilience. Land acquisition programs, while expensive, can be cost-effective compared to the long-term costs of protecting and repeatedly repairing infrastructure in vulnerable locations.

Economic Instruments and Incentives

Economic tools can encourage adaptation and reduce vulnerability to water level impacts. Insurance programs that accurately reflect risk can discourage development in high-risk areas and encourage property owners to invest in protective measures. However, insurance must be affordable and available to be effective, requiring careful design and potentially public subsidies for low-income property owners.

Tax incentives and grant programs can support adaptation investments by property owners and communities. Funding for shoreline protection, infrastructure upgrades, and property buyouts helps distribute the costs of adaptation more equitably and enables action that might not otherwise be affordable. Federal, state, and provincial governments have established various assistance programs, but funding often falls short of needs.

Investing in adaptation generates economic benefits by avoiding future losses and maintaining the productivity of Great Lakes-dependent industries. Cost-benefit analyses increasingly show that proactive adaptation is more economical than reactive disaster response and recovery. However, securing funding for adaptation remains challenging, especially for measures that provide benefits over long time horizons.

Research Needs and Knowledge Gaps

Improving Climate Projections

Despite significant advances in climate modeling, substantial uncertainties remain in projecting future Great Lakes water levels. Continued research is needed to improve understanding of the complex interactions between atmospheric processes, lake dynamics, and watershed hydrology. Higher-resolution models that better represent local climate features and lake processes can reduce uncertainty and provide more useful information for decision-makers.

Long-term monitoring of water levels, climate variables, and ecosystem conditions provides essential data for validating models and detecting emerging trends. Great Lakes water levels data constitute one of the longest high quality hydrometeorological data sets in North America with United States' reference gauge records beginning in 1860. Maintaining and enhancing this monitoring network is critical for understanding how the system is changing and improving our ability to project future conditions.

Research on extreme events and their impacts is particularly important given the increasing frequency and severity of water level extremes. Understanding the physical processes that drive rapid water level changes and the cascading effects on ecosystems and infrastructure can inform better preparedness and response strategies.

Socioeconomic Impact Assessment

More comprehensive assessment of the economic and social impacts of water level changes is needed to support decision-making and prioritize adaptation investments. Current impact assessments often focus on direct costs such as property damage and shipping disruptions, but indirect and cumulative effects may be equally or more significant.

Understanding how different communities and demographic groups are affected by water level changes is important for ensuring equitable adaptation policies. Low-income communities and communities of color may face disproportionate impacts and have fewer resources to adapt, raising environmental justice concerns that should inform policy responses.

Research on the effectiveness of different adaptation strategies can help communities and policymakers make informed choices about where to invest limited resources. Comparative studies of different approaches to shoreline protection, infrastructure design, and land use planning can identify best practices and lessons learned.

Ecosystem Response and Resilience

Understanding how Great Lakes ecosystems respond to changing water levels and other climate stressors is essential for effective environmental management. Research on fish populations, wetland dynamics, and invasive species interactions under varying water level conditions can inform conservation strategies and help predict future ecological changes.

Identifying ecosystem thresholds and tipping points beyond which recovery becomes difficult or impossible is critical for setting management targets and avoiding irreversible damage. Long-term ecological monitoring programs provide essential data for detecting changes and evaluating the effectiveness of management actions.

Research on nature-based adaptation solutions and their multiple benefits can support wider adoption of these approaches. Demonstrating the cost-effectiveness and co-benefits of green infrastructure and ecosystem restoration can overcome skepticism and encourage investment in natural solutions.

Policy Recommendations and Future Directions

Integrated Water Management

Addressing the challenges of changing water levels requires integrated approaches that consider the full range of water management objectives and stakeholder interests. Decisions about water level regulation, infrastructure investment, and land use planning should be coordinated across jurisdictions and sectors to avoid conflicting actions and maximize benefits.

Stakeholder engagement processes that bring together diverse interests—including shipping, hydropower, municipalities, environmental groups, and Indigenous communities—can build consensus around management approaches and adaptation strategies. While achieving consensus is challenging, inclusive processes lead to more durable and effective solutions.

Adaptive management frameworks that allow for learning and adjustment over time are essential given the uncertainties in climate projections and ecosystem responses. Management plans should include triggers for review and revision based on monitoring data and new scientific understanding. Flexibility to adjust strategies as conditions change is more valuable than rigid long-term plans.

Climate Change Mitigation

While adaptation to changing water levels is necessary, reducing greenhouse gas emissions to limit future climate change remains the most important long-term strategy. The Great Lakes region has significant opportunities to reduce emissions through energy efficiency, renewable energy development, sustainable transportation, and other measures.

Regional climate action plans should explicitly consider the connections between emissions reductions and water level impacts. Demonstrating how mitigation efforts can reduce future water level extremes and associated costs can build support for ambitious climate policies. The economic importance of the Great Lakes provides strong motivation for regional climate leadership.

International cooperation on climate change mitigation is essential, as the Great Lakes region cannot solve the problem alone. Advocacy for strong national and international climate policies should be a priority for Great Lakes states and provinces, given their high vulnerability to climate impacts.

Funding and Resources

Adequate and sustained funding for adaptation, research, and monitoring is critical for managing water level challenges. Federal, state, and provincial governments should increase investments in Great Lakes programs, recognizing the economic importance of the region and the costs of inaction. Innovative financing mechanisms, including green bonds and public-private partnerships, can supplement traditional funding sources.

Technical assistance programs that help communities and property owners understand risks and implement adaptation measures are valuable complements to financial assistance. Many smaller communities lack the expertise to assess vulnerabilities and develop adaptation plans, and providing access to technical resources can enable more effective action.

Prioritizing investments based on risk, vulnerability, and co-benefits ensures that limited resources are used effectively. Cost-benefit analysis and multi-criteria decision frameworks can help identify high-priority projects that provide the greatest return on investment and serve multiple objectives.

Conclusion: Building Resilience for an Uncertain Future

The effects of global warming on Great Lakes water levels represent one of the most significant environmental and economic challenges facing the region. A greater understanding that the extremes in water levels observed in the past may be exceeded under a changing climate will help in the planning of future developments and activities within the Great Lakes basin with a forward looking coastal risk assessment and help communites build resilience to future extremes.

The latest scientific research suggests that water levels are likely to rise on average in the coming decades, but with increased variability and more frequent extremes in both directions. This creates a complex challenge for the millions of people and thousands of businesses that depend on the Great Lakes. Adaptation will require coordinated action across multiple scales, from individual property owners to international governance bodies.

The economic stakes are enormous. With a regional economy of $6 trillion and critical industries including shipping, manufacturing, tourism, agriculture, and energy production all dependent on stable water levels, the costs of inaction far exceed the investments needed for adaptation. Proactive measures to protect infrastructure, restore ecosystems, and improve water management can reduce future losses and maintain the economic vitality of the region.

Success will require embracing uncertainty and building flexibility into our systems and institutions. Rather than trying to maintain historical water level patterns, we must accept that the Great Lakes are entering a new era of greater variability and design our infrastructure, economies, and communities to be resilient across a wider range of conditions. This represents a fundamental shift in how we think about water management and coastal development.

The challenges are significant, but so are the opportunities. Investments in adaptation can create jobs, drive innovation, and improve quality of life while protecting the natural resources that make the Great Lakes region special. By acting now to prepare for changing water levels, we can ensure that future generations continue to benefit from these remarkable freshwater seas that have shaped the region's history and will determine its future.

For more information on Great Lakes water levels and climate change impacts, visit the NOAA Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, the Great Lakes Integrated Sciences and Assessments, the International Joint Commission, and the Environment and Climate Change Canada Great Lakes water levels page.

Key Challenges and Impacts Summary

  • Shoreline erosion and property damage: High water levels combined with storm events accelerate coastal erosion, undermining buildings, roads, and utilities while causing hundreds of millions of dollars in damage to residential and commercial properties.
  • Flooding of coastal communities: Record high water levels in 2019-2020 flooded thousands of homes and businesses, creating public health hazards, displacing residents, and straining emergency management resources across the region.
  • Disruption of shipping routes and increased transportation costs: Both high and low water levels constrain navigation, forcing vessels to carry lighter loads, increasing the number of trips required, and raising costs for industries dependent on Great Lakes shipping.
  • Decline in fish populations and habitat loss: Rapid water level fluctuations disrupt fish spawning, flood or expose critical wetland habitats, and alter food web dynamics, threatening both commercial and recreational fisheries.
  • Increased infrastructure maintenance and adaptation costs: Water intake systems, wastewater facilities, marinas, power plants, and other infrastructure require costly modifications to function across wider ranges of water levels, with billions of dollars in investments needed.
  • Agricultural impacts and water supply challenges: Flooding destroys crops and makes fields inaccessible, while low water levels affect irrigation systems and groundwater availability, reducing agricultural productivity and increasing costs.
  • Energy production constraints: Hydroelectric facilities and thermal power plants face operational challenges from water level extremes, potentially reducing power generation and increasing electricity costs for consumers.
  • Ecosystem degradation and biodiversity loss: Changing water levels stress aquatic and coastal ecosystems, threatening species that depend on specific habitat conditions and reducing the ecological services that healthy ecosystems provide.
  • Economic losses across multiple sectors: The combined impacts on shipping, tourism, fishing, manufacturing, agriculture, and other industries create substantial economic costs that ripple through the $6 trillion Great Lakes regional economy.
  • Increased uncertainty and planning challenges: Greater variability and more frequent extremes make it difficult to plan infrastructure investments, manage resources, and make long-term business decisions, creating additional economic risks and costs.